US Battery Storage Facilities Set Capacity Records: IHS Markit

France's Neoen Augments Queensland Battery Project to 270 MW/540 MWh

Utilities in the US are poised to leapfrog each other in the race to have the largest installation in the country and the world, as a California facility was expanded this month, but a Florida utility will soon finish an even bigger project, writes Kevin Adler, Editor, Climate & Sustainability Group, IHS Markit, in a timely new piece.

These developments support an assessment of the industry’s near-term potential issued by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) in August, he argues. EIA said project developers are on track to install at least 10 GW of large-scale battery storage capacity in the US during the years 2021 through 2023, which would be about 10 times the storage capacity available in 2019.

On 19 August, Vistra Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility said it completed Phase II of the world’s largest battery storage facility in Monterey County, California. The facility can now store 400 MW of power and provide up to 1,600 MWh of delivery capacity.

California Goes With Rule for Solar and Battery Storage on New Buildings

Also Read

Ultimately, Vistra says it can reach 1,500 MW/6,000 MWh of storage at the site. And at that point, it could again recapture the title of largest facility in the world.

But temporarily at least, it will have to cede its position to Florida Power and Light’s (FP&L) Manatee Energy Storage Center in Manatee County, Florida. FP&L said on 20 August that the facility is 75% complete, with 100 of its 132 battery units installed and all 132 inverters in place. (Inverters convert DC electricity from batteries to AC electricity.)

The Manatee site is expected to be completed and hooked up to the grid by the end of 2021, FP&L said in a statement. At completion, the facility will have capacity of 409 MW and a delivery capacity of 900 MWh.

India’s Energy Storage Tech Capacity to Reach 180-800 GW by 2050

Also Read

IHS Markit tracks battery projects globally, and the other largest projects currently in operation are a 202.8-MW facility in Qinghai, China; a 111-MW facility in Jiangsu, China; and a 100-MW facility in Tullamore, Ireland. Projects at 1,000 MW or larger have been proposed for Qinghai, as well as Queensland, Australia, and Oregon in the US, said Tiffany Wang, research analyst at IHS.

Augmentation

The lesson of the Moss Landing facility, though not Manatee, is that augmentation of storage at existing sites is the way the storage industry is evolving, said Jason Burwen, acting CEO of the Energy Storage Association (ESA). Augmentation is adding more than a marginal amount of new capacity at existing storage locations.

Burwen observed that augmentation at a modest level already is common in the industry because battery systems degrade over time, and some operators counteract this by replacing aging units with the same-sized or slightly larger-sized systems. But the type of augmentation at Moss Landing is of a different degree, as it added 100 MW to an existing site.

The other augmentation trend that Burwen sees involves increasing the duration of power, rather than output for a moment in time. In other words, new storage can lengthen the number of hours that power can be sent back to the grid.

These expansions come from the modular nature of battery storage industry, which enables quickly adding components where opportunity and need arise. This gives operators tremendous flexibility, which will help to drive further growth. For example, a utility that’s considering a storage option does not have to decide between four-hour and six-hour storage, Burwen explained. Thanks to modularity, “you can have a four-hour battery today, and it can be an eight-hour battery at the same site thanks to augmentation.”

Co-location

EIA’s study also identified a feature of the new facilities that is going to become increasingly common: co-location with generation, including renewable power. Currently, about 38% of US battery storage is co-located with generation, of which 8% is natural gas-fired and 30% wind and solar.

In the next few years, this will shift dramatically. “If all the currently announced projects from 2021 to 2023 become operational, then the share of US battery storage that is co-located with [renewables] generation would increase from 30% to 60%,” EIA said.

To put it another way, EIA said that nearly 25% of all the planned solar PV capacity for years 2021-2023 will include co-located storage, compared with less than 2% of existing solar PV capacity as of December 2020, according to IHS.

Growth Factors

Burwen said several factors are driving the growth in battery storage. The first is cost. Size has a complementary benefit, which is that as capacity grows, stored power can become more important to energy reliability. Furthermore, the small size and modular design means that battery installations can be online in a matter of months, not the years it takes to bring on new power generation, he said.

The modular design also saves money for battery developers, as they do not have to invest large amounts of capital years before power is needed, Burwen pointed out.

To continue the momentum or even increase the pace of battery storage installations, Burwen said obtaining a federal storage investment tax credit is at the “top of mind for us.” He added that the availability of such credits for wind and solar installations has been proven to encourage new investment by improving cost competitiveness, and he sees the same opportunity for batteries, both in the number of installations and their size.

The other issue is one of planning, Burwen said. “In states that have decarbonization goals or utilities that have made net-zero pledges, they need to realize that investments being made today are 20- or 30-year investments,” he said. “It raises the question in a state that has to be carbon free in a couple of decades, what if my utility is coming in with a [proposal for a new] gas-fired power plant? Should we be doing that? Why not a portfolio of storage and clean energy resources?”

Utility regulators in those states should demand the utility explain why clean energy assets won’t work, he said, rather than the typical practice today of accepting the gas-fired unit if the demand projections look reasonable, concludes Adler (IHS).